Lindsay Nichols is a staff attorney with Legal Community Against Violence, a San Francisco-based public interest law center dedicated to preventing gun violence.
Private citizens should not be allowed to carry firearms openly in public. The open carrying of firearms on the street and in places like restaurants and parks intimidates the public, wastes law enforcement resources, and increases the risk that someone will be injured or killed from the accidental or intentional use of firearms. In response to these dangers and an aggressive "open carry movement" in California, in 2011 the California Legislature banned the open carrying of handguns. Other states should consider similar action.
[See the latest political cartoons.]
When individuals openly carry firearms in public, other citizens may become concerned about impending crime and contact the police. In this way, the open carrying of firearms causes a waste of law enforcement resources, but more importantly, it threatens public safety. A press release issued by the San Mateo County, Calif. Sheriff's Office in 2010 described the particular challenges facing officers who must respond to these 911 calls:
[blockqoute]Open carry advocates create a potentially very dangerous situation. When police are called to a "man with a gun" call they typically are responding to a situation about which they have few details other than that one or more people are present at a location and are armed. Officers may have no idea that these people are simply "exercising their rights." Consequently, the law enforcement response is one of "hypervigilant urgency" in order to protect the public from an armed threat. Should the gun carrying person fail to comply with a law enforcement instruction or move in a way that could be construed as threatening, the police are forced to respond in kind for their own protection. It's well and good in hindsight to say the gun carrier was simply "exercising their rights" but the result could be deadly. Simply put, it is not recommended to openly carry firearms. [/blockqoute]
It is appropriate for law enforcement officers and the public to treat these situations as extremely dangerous. Open carry advocates claim they need a gun for self-defense. However, if the Trayvon Martin case has taught us anything, it is that an individual carrying a gun may misjudge a situation, think self-defense is called for, and erroneously—and often tragically—reach for the gun. The open carrying of firearms, and the display of aggressiveness involved, only makes these situations more frequent, creating the potential for everyday interpersonal conflicts to turn into deadly shootouts.
Tags:Second Amendment, gun control and gun rights About Debate ClubA meeting of the sharpest minds on the day's most important topics, Debate Club brings in the best arguments and lets readers decide which is the most persuasive. Read the arguments, then vote. And be sure to check back often to see who has gotten the most support—and also to see what's being discussed now in the Debate Club.
Have ideas about what the Club should be debating? E-mail it to dclub@usnews.com.
You can also join the debate on Facebook or follow Debate Club on Twitter.
Advertisement Cartoons See cartoons on the GOP 2012 hopefuls. See cartoons on the European debt crisis. See cartoons on Barack Obama. Thomas Jefferson Street BlogDem pollster Hart says Obama's no better than 50-50; GOP pollster Bolger says no GOP landslide is possible this year.
The time for Republican candidates to redouble efforts at fundraising and organization building is now.
The GOP still likes disclosure in campaign finance--just not this year.
Because Corzine is a Democrat and Obama is a Democrat, people who should know better are ready and willing to turn a blind eye to what is going on.
Republican Policy Committee Chairman Tom Price has an interesting definition of 'comrpomise.'
Dressing nuns down in such a public and demeaning way not only adds insult to that injury, but damages the image of the church.
Once the waters are muddied, what will be left of Romney's message?
We cannot prosecute and find guilty someone we don't like or like the actions of. That is not justice.
Advertisement SubscribeAn insider's guide to politics and policy, available on the iPad or as a PDF download.
Subscribe today!
See the latest editorial cartoons on President Obama.
Take a look at the potential 2012 presidential candidates.
